[longle]

紫微斗數的十二宮位，本來就有着他們各自正確的命理作用。

但被誤用誤解的宮位，斗數的父母宮就是其中之一。

父母宮不是相貌宮。

你不妨看有血緣關係的兄弟姐妹的命盤就知。

你也不妨看親友的兄弟姐妹的命盤就知道答案。

有血緣關係的兄弟姐妹的相貌，有的相似，有的簡直是一模一樣。

但，他們的斗數命盤，各自的父母宮的星曜組合格局都不一樣。

你又如何解釋呢？

單憑一張命盤，相貌是看不出的，不管你用什麼宮，參考什麼宮都是一樣的。

用相貌來印証命盤也是不對的，你能知道命主正確的相貌嗎？你能事先畫出命主的相貌嗎？ 同樣一張命盤的人，在世界上有很多，但是他們每一個人的相貌都是一樣的嗎？

[苦思冥想]

但實際上算命師亦常斷相貌，以作證驗，同盤之人，其貌不同，其形其質卻差也不多，不能依盤繪人，卻能斷其是否臉型肥滿，是否貌美多淫等等，我雖有一二心得，終究閱歷不足，故在此研究，望有同好不吝賜教。古書便有以星論貌之說，自不是空穴來風。單說不能論，未免武斷了。

[jackchan_b2b]

Regarding the outlook of human being, my advice is that you can pick up later because out look will change depend on the environment, nature, climate or whatsoever factors.

I ever thought of the point that why those ancient telling on outlook with respect to ZiWei DouShu, yet I can not find a good reason to accept this telling.

Here is a short story before I picked up the ZiWei DouShu b myself regading the issue of Out Look in ZiWei DouShu.

I ever saw a Singaporean ZiWei DouShu master used the out look in ZiWei DouShu to confirm a birth chart of a woman, he told the husband and wife that the chart was not belonging to her and insisting this in front of a group of audiences. Didn’t know whether he was unlucky or a bad day, the Taiwanese husband happened to have the basic of ZiWei DouShu and pointed out how he came out the chart with those events that had happened to them before according to Stars and Gong.
I was the organizer and I didn’t know ZiWei DouShu at that time, I ran the event upon a favour for a Singaporean friend. The moment I saw the arguement of that master and the husband, I realized one thing——-the truth and the realistic are two diifferent things, which one you prefer?
:pig5::pig5::pig5::pig5::pig5::pig5::pig5:

[苦思冥想]

My English is poor，所以也不用英語作答了，不過版主大大講的應該是看懂了。其實有此疑問也不是突發奇想，因為曾經對於面相也有所接觸，可是覺得面相有些說法未免牽強，正是因為相貌是易變的，正如邁克傑克遜一般，相貌已變得于之前大為不同，更遑論面相了！可是五術本一家，面相雖然不及紫薇邏輯清晰，卻也不是無憑無據。正如耳大者創造力豐富，這是科學已將其證實的，于面相某些說法也算不謀而合。而相貌在現代社會亦算重要，其實在命盤中這種重要的信息不可能無所傳達，至少廉貞化錄之餘相貌確實是經實踐地。因為現實是廉貞化錄在命三方會優化周圍人對其相貌的評價，即為貌美之證。諸如此者，還有多列。不過打字太累了，先說這一條。:pig10: 不知各位是否有此感覺，另外the truth and the realistic are two diifferent things, which one you prefer?
這是個很糾結的問題啊。。。:pig9: 小輩見識淺薄，還請多多指教

[jackchan_b2b]

原帖由 苦思冥想 於 2009-7-10 02:52 PM 發表。
My English is poor，所以也不用英語作答了，不過版主大大講的應該是看懂了。其實有此疑問也不是突發奇想，因為曾經對於面相也有所接觸，可是覺得面相有些說法未免牽強，正是因為相貌是易變的，正如邁克傑克遜一 …

Yes, you can say that certain coincidence happened on both science and metaphysics.
It is the degree of accuracy in the application on using the stars to describe the actual outlook of a person; nevertheless, now we know a lot of races all over the world and their appearance may not fit to our ZiWei Stars.
In order to use to describe with high level of confidence, and comfortably using ZiWei stars with respect to out look of human being, I suggest that we need to maintain neutral on why and how our predecessor wrote the 相貌 methods.

As for an actual appearance on a person in fortune telling, I believe it does exist and reliable. I am not writing out this to please anyone or the 面相學 studying; because this method is realistic and practically utilizes in a lot of field works.
Facial can change, this is exactly right, and this is the fate……. fate won’t stop at a point and it always changes.
For the example of Michael Jackson, he had too many cuts, sometime I did ask myself, why he did this to himself? May be we won’t have actual answer on how the changed facial with respect to fate, but we can use the after changed facial to re-study the fate again. So, Facial always change and fate never stop. Back to the same statement again.

As for the truth, on using ZiWei Stars to tell out look of a person, who knows?
Inconsistency happened here and there and can not clearly tell the sign of happening or facial characteristics of that person.

For example 冰鉴, well describe the signs of a person in many aspects; the fate, behaviours, characteristics and may be more.
Of course the reading for facial have many, mostly good one which I can’t list out through English.

In conclusion, what I mean is to use those we can manage and control to improve our skills than using something we can’t.

It doesn’t matter to use whatever language, as long as we understand what are we talking about.

[ 本帖最後由 jackchan_b2b 於 2009-7-10 03:45 PM 編輯 ]

[llij]

見人見智 每個人審美觀不同:pig7:

[amingor168]

我朋友說他老婆很美，可我們幾個鬥陣的朋友卻大都認為醜斃了！好怕他哪一天發明了一種新的論命論相貌之術，到時候作者以為的美醜標準，恐怕會給後代子孫整個誤導了吧！呵呵…開玩笑的啦！
:pig11: :pig11: :pig11: