-
原帖由 nccr 於 2013-6-16 03:41 AM 發表。
別忘了,不久前江大師對於4X4填充法是否是真法所提出的那幾點疑問與挑戰,
就是那篇第一點偽版數出數法是否可以在算盤上面推算的問題。。。云云。 :pig8:多謝tbat兄這些寳貴意見。這些都是偽版數 …
呵呵,正是,正是,我轉貼一下,所有版權歸江大師所有: :pig8:
江大師對各位懂得16宮出數法的易友友善的『挑戰』?:以上一例甚有創意,[color=Red]或許就是大眾所認為的甚麼十六位法,但仍有一點靜川絕對補充,以上方法諸多漏洞之處,尤以:[/color]
(1)如何在算盤運算呢?
(2)如何以鐵版神數中的一時八刻,一刻十五分去區分命運呢?
(3)諸多鐵版神數命書中的易卦問題又如何解決呢?
(4)以上起例,「姊妹二人姻緣配合」及「此刻生人,父先亡于金年」,假若兩姊妹是雙胞胎(即同八字)又或兩姊妹不同八字,又或天下間符合此兩條數的人甚多,他們命中必有此兩條數,若根據以上方法推算豈不是所得出的命運內容難道是一樣嗎?[ 本帖最後由 tbat 於 2013-6-16 11:52 AM 編輯 ]
-
原帖由 zeekusa 於 2013-6-16 10:41 AM 發表。
但是, 後面剩下的批章條文, 卻無法用相同方法推出
呵,只要『所知』的條文夠多,不止一般坊間的一萬兩千條文本,
甚至連十二萬兩千條文版的也全部都可以『扣』出來,
原因為何? 在之前的貼文已經有所說明,不再重複,
就像ALEX版大所說,此法只是入門法,非究竟法,
若是真的對研究神數有興趣,不但要懂得先人前輩的東西,
更要能夠自己去獨立思考以及研究突破,
而欲想研究以及突破神數這門數術,最重要的就是一個『悟』字!所有出數方法,到最後只是一個方便法,
如手指月,手並非月,所有佛經皆方便法,
人生變化何其無窮,易理第一理即是變易,
一切無常,欲以一成不變去套所有變,殆矣! -
-
-
-
-
-
原帖由 zeekusa 於 2013-6-16 11:20 AM 發表。
這個批章我研究2年了, 不是像你想像這麼簡單. 我也不是要等別人來解. 我只是想表達, 可能需要2種方法.
Consider the followings:
1. NOT all the inputs have to be written in there.
2. There might be elements of pure intuitions, thus no traces of method at work here.
3. Yes, you may be right, there might be 2 or even more different methods at play here.Best Wishes! :pig5:
-
-
原帖由 mchen100 於 2013-6-16 11:30 AM 發表。
Quite right, but if you can “assume” those unwritten inputs and “prove” them, you will understand what I am trying to express.
Yes, the problem with studying only the 命書 is precisely that.
The only info we have to go on is the 命書 itself.
The 命書 is the result; there might be many other “hidden” inputs, processes, methods, and specific situations that went into the formation of the final result.
(i.e. Perhaps the 命主 volunteered much info to the 命師, there were some very lucky guesses…etc.)
We are trying to deduce the processes and the inputs from the final product.
There is a gross lack of information. We are left to make many assumptions (and some may argue wishful thinking) on our own.Furthermore, we are using essentially an inductive reasoning and researching process and thus ultimately all resultant theories are probabilistic at best.
As Karl Popper so famously argued inductive reasoning process is better suited at looking and finding errors rather than finding answers…
[ 本帖最後由 tbat 於 2013-6-16 11:45 AM 編輯 ]
Log in to reply.
-
以試算表形式看偽版數